About Me

Name:Grandpa Joe
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

great country

Is this country great or not! What other country in the world could you have a black minority, educated at Harvard, with the accompanying law degree, but with no experience in any real world environment, except as an advocate and an activist for special interests, with a minor level of experience in politics as a state representative and just 3 years into his election as a junior senator for the state of Illinois, accept the nomination from the largest political body in the world, (democrats) to be their candidate for the Presidency of the United States of America, and to represent you and me to the world. If this isn’t great I don’t know what is.

Hopefully, however, the more mature and more reflective part of this great country will carefully review the challenges that face us in the real world, and how this very accomplished but inexperienced and not tested candidate will hold up in the rigors of international and domestic politics and the specific threats to our security and the safety of our way of life, and carefully review his stated policies on how he and his fellow democrats (Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, Clinton, Boxer, and associates) will accomplish this.

I am sure the teachers union and other unions along with the trial lawyers and the environmental advocates concerned with the main threat to mankind of global warming and carbon footprints will have many ideas on how he should go about addressing these issues. For me, I am hopeful that sounder heads will prevail and accept the fact that a democratic president to go along with a most likely majority democratic house and senate would be a major setback for our country and economy and take us on the path to socialism that affects so many of the European countries. Be sure and vote and if you can VOTE REPUBLICAN AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY!

Dad/Grandpa/ Joe

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Big Bang for 10 Billion

The WSJ a few weeks ago published a commentary by Mr. Bjorn Lomborg of the Copenhagen Consensus on "How to get the biggest bang for 10 billion bucks" It appears the the journal has asked some "notables" for their perspectives on their opinion on how to meet this challenge. The first two were Newt and Jerry (Mr. Moonbeam of California fame). The second group included Steny Hoyer the majority whip in the house. His comments solidified my opinion that the leadership of the democratic party does not get any better after Pelosi and Reid as Mr Hoyer never addresed the question on how to spend 10 billion for the biggest returns. He some how chose alternative energy but instead of offering the idea of the value of the ROI he used the opportunity to blast the Bush administration and the oil companies. As a shareholder of Exxon and other oil companies (as most likely anyone who has mutual fund shares) I am pleased with the performance of their companies. I appreciate the dividends and the gains on the stock price. So keep up the good work. As an aside. I don't remember how many jobs Stoyer has provided with earmarks but I bet it does not match the number provided by "Big Oil".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

convention time

I would really appreciate if someone would explain to me the value of holding a republican and democrat national convention. We know who the candidates are for each party. The candidate picks his running mate so why do we spend enormous sums and create significant pollution (all the travel and hot air) subject the homeless to explotation for two weeks worth of nothing on TV programs that hardly anyone watches. What is the purpose? grandpa
Tags: politicsI  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

voting on issues

We are entering the final months of our National Elections. (Thank God). I have become more concerned for our country then in any other time in my voting history. So I wanted to remind all of you to vote. I also wanted to point out that it would be appropriate for you to know or find out how your presidential candidates and congressional candidates currently see these issues and, if they have a political record in congress or their past history, how they have voted on issues in these broad categories or on other issues that you consider important. Again I urge you not to be carried away with just words, style, or charm but focus on actual voting records and performance and statements on policy.

Following are what I see as some of the major issues facing our country at this time. They are listed in some order of priority based on my own bias’s.

National Security
Islamic Terrorism
Energy Dependence/foreign oil
Military
Energy
Oil Drilling: Off continental shelf, Gulf of Mexico, ANWR, Arctic Region. Nuclear Power plants. Using food products for energy.
Government Spending
EARMARKS!
Foreign policy
Taxes
Personal Income taxes
Corporate Income taxes
Social Security and Medicare taxes
Health care
Government coverage for General Population
Medicare
Social Security
Change from the current Ponzi scheme (collecting from current work force to pay for the already retired. There is not a separate account with the current FICA taxes accumulating). Personal social security accounts
Global Warming
Carbon Taxes
Education
Vouchers and teachers union influence.
Free Trade and union influence
Immigration both legal and illegal

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

change

I thought you might find this quote by Benjamin Disraeli interesting seeing as how one of our presidential candidates is running on change and if his current hsitory of changing  very frequently where he stands on the issues, we are in for quite a ride if he is elected and we have Reid and Pelosi in their currernt positions of "leadership"?.
 
Quote: "In a progressive country, change is constant; and the great question is not whether you shoulf resist change, which is inevitable, but whether change should be carried out in deference to the manners, customs, the laws and tradions of its people, or whether it should be carried out in deference to absolute principles, and arbitrary and general doctrines."
Tags: change  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The biggest outsource

A large number of democratic colleagues, both in the house and the senate, have continued, in the past, to voice concern for our economy and especially our work force about the problems of globalization and the impact to them by our corporations desire to send work or to establish oversea activities especially when the economics of the issue seem to make sense. In other words if you can buy it or make it or provide it for less cost but with quality service or products it makes sense, especially to their shareholders even though it might cost jobs here..

In case they have missed it, a certain Mr. Pickens has brought to the world’s attention the largest outsourcing issue in the history of our country with his ads regarding our energy problems and the outflow of capital to the tune of 6 to 7 billion dollars per year. He does not mention the number of jobs this represented nor the impact on dollar, trade balance, national debt and our budgets. Just think of the number of high paying jobs we would create, the impact on the dollar, the balance of trade, and the national debt if we would reduce these purchases even if only by 20 to 30%.

If enough pressure would be brought by the American public, on congress, especially those by the workers represented by unions that the democratic party purports to want to protect, than maybe, just maybe, we can get congress off the dime and get some effective legislation to get going on long delayed drilling in known oil and natural gas deposits in our own country. I for the life of me cannot see the logic to buy from others, products that we have an abundance and the world’s leading technologies and companies to get the job done.

Please write your congressmen or senator and demand his attention to this issue NOW, even if you have no confidence, as I do, that it will make a difference to how they view the situation, based on there apparent misunderstanding of basic economics and the laws of supply and demand and the impact on our country. Ask them, that for a change, to do something to benefit the majority of Americans and not just their special interest groups.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Energy Bill? Ha! Ha!

I find it hard to believe congress is serious about an energy bill that does not contain maximizing the current energy resources that we are familiar with and have proven costs and benefits well known rather then going after unproven techniques that are controversial and have limited information about the cost/benefits and the unintended consequences. What is wrong with going after more nuclear power facilities? We already have a number in excess of 100 that have track records of risks and costs. What is wrong with increasing our efforts to find additional oil resources and exploiting the many that have already been identified like Alaska, off shore in the gulf, and others. We know the costs and benefits and risks with these. Why not exploit our coal reserves rather the big investments in wind and solar. Can you imagine living across the street from 100 acres of wind mills or solar cells. (senator Kennedy and the people in Massachusetts did.) Come on congress get serious and if you can't get out of the way and put a panel of experts together and in an open forum discuss and listen to what they have to say and what their recommendations would be. Try a group from American Enterprise Institute, Brooking, Cato, and the Heritage Foundation and any other experts you want and listen to their consensus solutions to a serious problem and get the politics out of it( this is not my idea but it is a good one). Grandpa
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"stuff" from an older fellow

I probably have nothing better to do so I thought I would share a few thoughts about the election process and the current status. I don't know about you, but I am already sick  of listening and looking at all of them, both republican and democrat candidates including those who have not decided to run, and listening to them "babble' about nothing and avoiding discussions that address the real issues in some meaningful discourse. At this point I am really discouraged with the process and with the candidates. I have voted in all elections since Truman and as I have advanced in age and hopefully in wisdom I see the process of electing an individual for the most powerful position in the world as turning into a ongoing tv show and a bad one at that. I sometimes think we were better served when we picked candidates "in smoked filled back rooms". So thanks for reading and while I am at it call your senator and have him or her vote against the SCHIP proposal that just made it through the house on the false pretense of "being for the children". I think if you look into it a significant number of adults are getting the benefit that were not included in the original bill that expires, I believe, in September. I don't know why we waited so long to address the extension but like most stuff in congress it gets hidden in the details by waiting until the last minute for resolution. I am asking the president to veto it if it gets by everyone in its present form. Maybe we can have lengthy legitimate debate on health care after that.
Grandpa
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

War

I don't know how to do it but would some of you that do, be kind enough to ask both the republican and democrat candidates for the presidency and our congressional leadership if they want to win the war against Islamic Fascists who have indicated any number of times and from different sources to eliminate western idealogy and culture and to do whatever and how long, it takes to achieve victory. A simple yes or no. No long winded answers that don't quite answer the question or let you know exactly where they stand. Thank You. Grandpa
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

 

Some Things I Don’t Understand:

Almost everything that I read in the MSM and in other Sources such as the WSJ and internet sites as well as the major TV news channels seem to separate “the war” into different categories. Iraq (the one Bush started?). We won that one when Saddam was toppled. The war against Terrorism (which is a tactic) and not an identifiable entity by country. Afghanistan (the other war) is often not mentioned (unless there are American deaths) as well as other areas of conflict such as Colombia and the Philippines to name a few. It seems to me that we (Americans) would have a more clear understanding if everyone would identify and categorize what is going on in the world, into one single category, as a “WAR Against Extremism, primarily Islamic (Jihad) Fundamentalists“. This seems to be the major common denominator throughout the world and the various antagonists, including Taliban, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Muslim Brotherhood, Sunnis, Shiites, Syria, Iran, to name a few. Our friendly despot in North Korea is a separate issue but terrorism and threats are his tactics as well. I think the country should get off all the political correctness and, as they used to say, call a spade a spade, and refer to this as “The War Against Extremism” regardless of where it is fought and one we must win to preserve western culture and our way of life.

The attempt to separate the different actions is, I believe one of the main reasons for the discord and disagreement amongst Americans from all walks of life and political groups. Perhaps by rallying around this definition of the war we can unite as a country regardless of who is President or who controls the house or the senate and focus on the main objective which is to defeat extremism regardless of how long it takes, which I fear is most likely to be for many more years, if not forever, due to the nature of the enemy.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I was just wondering why our congress seems to always have little additions to defense spending bills that have nothing to do with defense spending. Most recently the kennedy/Smith add on about hate crimes. It wouldn't have anything to do with getting something unnecessary passed by putting it in a bill that the president wants very much and would be reluctant to veto or would it?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »